193 lines
		
	
	
		
			8.2 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Markdown
		
	
	
	
	
	
			
		
		
	
	
			193 lines
		
	
	
		
			8.2 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Markdown
		
	
	
	
	
	
| # Unity - Getting Started
 | |
| 
 | |
| ## Welcome
 | |
| 
 | |
| Congratulations. You're now the proud owner of your very own pile of bits! What
 | |
| are you going to do with all these ones and zeros? This document should be able
 | |
| to help you decide just that.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Unity is a unit test framework. The goal has been to keep it small and
 | |
| functional. The core Unity test framework is three files: a single C file and a
 | |
| couple header files. These team up to provide functions and macros to make
 | |
| testing easier.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Unity was designed to be cross-platform. It works hard to stick with C standards
 | |
| while still providing support for the many embedded C compilers that bend the
 | |
| rules. Unity has been used with many compilers, including GCC, IAR, Clang,
 | |
| Green Hills, Microchip, and MS Visual Studio. It's not much work to get it to
 | |
| work with a new target.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| ### Overview of the Documents
 | |
| 
 | |
| #### Unity Assertions reference
 | |
| 
 | |
| This document will guide you through all the assertion options provided by
 | |
| Unity. This is going to be your unit testing bread and butter. You'll spend more
 | |
| time with assertions than any other part of Unity.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| #### Unity Assertions Cheat Sheet
 | |
| 
 | |
| This document contains an abridged summary of the assertions described in the
 | |
| previous document. It's perfect for printing and referencing while you
 | |
| familiarize yourself with Unity's options.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| #### Unity Configuration Guide
 | |
| 
 | |
| This document is the one to reference when you are going to use Unity with a new
 | |
| target or compiler. It'll guide you through the configuration options and will
 | |
| help you customize your testing experience to meet your needs.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| #### Unity Helper Scripts
 | |
| 
 | |
| This document describes the helper scripts that are available for simplifying
 | |
| your testing workflow. It describes the collection of optional Ruby scripts
 | |
| included in the auto directory of your Unity installation. Neither Ruby nor
 | |
| these scripts are necessary for using Unity. They are provided as a convenience
 | |
| for those who wish to use them.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| #### Unity License
 | |
| 
 | |
| What's an open source project without a license file? This brief document
 | |
| describes the terms you're agreeing to when you use this software. Basically, we
 | |
| want it to be useful to you in whatever context you want to use it, but please
 | |
| don't blame us if you run into problems.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| ### Overview of the Folders
 | |
| 
 | |
| If you have obtained Unity through Github or something similar, you might be
 | |
| surprised by just how much stuff you suddenly have staring you in the face.
 | |
| Don't worry, Unity itself is very small. The rest of it is just there to make
 | |
| your life easier. You can ignore it or use it at your convenience. Here's an
 | |
| overview of everything in the project.
 | |
| 
 | |
| - `src` - This is the code you care about! This folder contains a C file and two
 | |
| header files. These three files _are_ Unity.
 | |
| - `docs` - You're reading this document, so it's possible you have found your way
 | |
| into this folder already. This is where all the handy documentation can be
 | |
| found.
 | |
| - `examples` - This contains a few examples of using Unity.
 | |
| - `extras` - These are optional add ons to Unity that are not part of the core
 | |
| project. If you've reached us through James Grenning's book, you're going to
 | |
| want to look here.
 | |
| - `test` - This is how Unity and its scripts are all tested. If you're just using
 | |
| Unity, you'll likely never need to go in here. If you are the lucky team member
 | |
| who gets to port Unity to a new toolchain, this is a good place to verify
 | |
| everything is configured properly.
 | |
| - `auto` - Here you will find helpful Ruby scripts for simplifying your test
 | |
| workflow. They are purely optional and are not required to make use of Unity.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| ## How to Create A Test File
 | |
| 
 | |
| Test files are C files. Most often you will create a single test file for each C
 | |
| module that you want to test. The test file should include unity.h and the
 | |
| header for your C module to be tested.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Next, a test file will include a `setUp()` and `tearDown()` function. The setUp
 | |
| function can contain anything you would like to run before each test. The
 | |
| tearDown function can contain anything you would like to run after each test.
 | |
| Both functions accept no arguments and return nothing. You may leave either or
 | |
| both of these blank if you have no need for them. If you're using a compiler
 | |
| that is configured to make these functions optional, you may leave them off
 | |
| completely. Not sure? Give it a try. If you compiler complains that it can't
 | |
| find setUp or tearDown when it links, you'll know you need to at least include
 | |
| an empty function for these.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The majority of the file will be a series of test functions. Test functions
 | |
| follow the convention of starting with the word "test_" or "spec_". You don't HAVE
 | |
| to name them this way, but it makes it clear what functions are tests for other
 | |
| developers.  Also, the automated scripts that come with Unity or Ceedling will default
 | |
| to looking for test functions to be prefixed this way. Test functions take no arguments 
 | |
| and return nothing. All test accounting is handled internally in Unity.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Finally, at the bottom of your test file, you will write a `main()` function.
 | |
| This function will call `UNITY_BEGIN()`, then `RUN_TEST` for each test, and
 | |
| finally `UNITY_END()`.This is what will actually trigger each of those test
 | |
| functions to run, so it is important that each function gets its own `RUN_TEST`
 | |
| call.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Remembering to add each test to the main function can get to be tedious. If you
 | |
| enjoy using helper scripts in your build process, you might consider making use
 | |
| of our handy generate_test_runner.rb script. This will create the main function
 | |
| and all the calls for you, assuming that you have followed the suggested naming
 | |
| conventions. In this case, there is no need for you to include the main function
 | |
| in your test file at all.
 | |
| 
 | |
| When you're done, your test file will look something like this:
 | |
| 
 | |
| ```C
 | |
| #include "unity.h"
 | |
| #include "file_to_test.h"
 | |
| 
 | |
| void setUp(void) {
 | |
|     // set stuff up here
 | |
| }
 | |
| 
 | |
| void tearDown(void) {
 | |
|     // clean stuff up here
 | |
| }
 | |
| 
 | |
| void test_function_should_doBlahAndBlah(void) {
 | |
|     //test stuff
 | |
| }
 | |
| 
 | |
| void test_function_should_doAlsoDoBlah(void) {
 | |
|     //more test stuff
 | |
| }
 | |
| 
 | |
| int main(void) {
 | |
|     UNITY_BEGIN();
 | |
|     RUN_TEST(test_function_should_doBlahAndBlah);
 | |
|     RUN_TEST(test_function_should_doAlsoDoBlah);
 | |
|     return UNITY_END();
 | |
| }
 | |
| ```
 | |
| 
 | |
| It's possible that you will need more customization than this, eventually.
 | |
| For that sort of thing, you're going to want to look at the configuration guide.
 | |
| This should be enough to get you going, though.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| ## How to Build and Run A Test File
 | |
| 
 | |
| This is the single biggest challenge to picking up a new unit testing framework,
 | |
| at least in a language like C or C++. These languages are REALLY good at getting
 | |
| you "close to the metal" (why is the phrase metal? Wouldn't it be more accurate
 | |
| to say "close to the silicon"?). While this feature is usually a good thing, it
 | |
| can make testing more challenging.
 | |
| 
 | |
| You have two really good options for toolchains. Depending on where you're
 | |
| coming from, it might surprise you that neither of these options is running the
 | |
| unit tests on your hardware.
 | |
| There are many reasons for this, but here's a short version:
 | |
| - On hardware, you have too many constraints (processing power, memory, etc),
 | |
| - On hardware, you don't have complete control over all registers,
 | |
| - On hardware, unit testing is more challenging,
 | |
| - Unit testing isn't System testing. Keep them separate.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Instead of running your tests on your actual hardware, most developers choose to
 | |
| develop them as native applications (using gcc or MSVC for example) or as
 | |
| applications running on a simulator. Either is a good option. Native apps have
 | |
| the advantages of being faster and easier to set up. Simulator apps have the
 | |
| advantage of working with the same compiler as your target application. The
 | |
| options for configuring these are discussed in the configuration guide.
 | |
| 
 | |
| To get either to work, you might need to make a few changes to the file
 | |
| containing your register set (discussed later).
 | |
| 
 | |
| In either case, a test is built by linking unity, the test file, and the C
 | |
| file(s) being tested. These files create an executable which can be run as the
 | |
| test set for that module. Then, this process is repeated for the next test file.
 | |
| This flexibility of separating tests into individual executables allows us to
 | |
| much more thoroughly unit test our system and it keeps all the test code out of
 | |
| our final release!
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| *Find The Latest of This And More at [ThrowTheSwitch.org](https://throwtheswitch.org)*
 | 
